下腔静脉加压法与Valsalva动作在提高卵圆孔未闭检出率中的对比研究

目的 探讨下腔静脉加压法与Valsalva动作在经食道超声心动图(Transesophageal echocardiography,TEE)对卵圆孔未闭(Patent foramen ovale,PFO)检出率中的差异。方法 回顾性分析手术证实的PFO患者114例,包括对比增强经颅多普勒超声(Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography,c-TCD)少量右向左分流(Right-to-left shunt,RLS)(n=51)组、中量RLS(n=37)组、大量RLS(n=26)组,记录常规TEE超声、Valsalva动作配合下TEE检查、PFO封堵术前无痛TEE下下腔静脉加压检测,分析3组房间隔右向左一过性分流信号发生率的不同和其它临床因素在3组间的差异。结果 3组身体质量指数(Body mass index,BMI)、高血压病、高脂血症及冠心病的比例无明显差异(P>0.05); 大量RLS组患者年龄明显小于少量RLS及中量RLS组(P<0.05)。少量RLS及中量RLS组患者Valsalva动作和下腔静脉加压后较常规TEE下PFO的显示率均有提高(P<0.01); 大量RLS组患者Valsalva动作和下腔静脉加压后PFO显示率改变不明显(P>0.05)。结论 大量RLS患者较少量及中量RLS患者的年龄小,更容易早期出现临床症状; 下腔静脉加压法可以替代Valsalva动作提高TEE超声对PFO的检出率。     

腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中应用盆腔腹膜关闭技术的疗效研究

目的:探讨盆腔腹膜关闭技术在腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术应用的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年5月我院54例腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术中行盆底腹膜关闭患者和57例未行盆底腹膜关闭患者的临床资料。结果:盆腔腹膜关闭组与盆腔腹膜未关闭组在手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后进食时间以及盆腔引流管拔除时间等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。盆腔腹膜关闭组中8例患者发生短期并发症;6例患者发生中期并发症;14例患者发生远期并发症,均为肠梗阻。盆腔腹膜未关闭组中31例患者发生短期并发症,28例患者发生中期并发症,36例患者发生远期并发症。所有患者均治疗好转。Coxs回归模型分析提示,盆腔腹膜是否关闭是腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术患者术后生存的独立指标。结论:腹腔镜Miles术中行盆底腹膜关闭安全可行,具有临床实用价值。     

Influence of coronary stenosis location on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based fractional flow reserve from CT angiography

BackgroundCompared with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary CT angiography (cCTA) is limited in detecting hemodynamically relevant lesions. cCTA-based FFR (CT-FFR) is an approach to overcome this insufficiency by use of computational fluid dynamics. Applying recent innovations in computer science, a machine learning (ML) method for CT-FFR derivation was introduced and showed improved diagnostic performance compared to cCTA alone. We sought to investigate the influence of stenosis location in the coronary artery system on the performance of ML-CT-FFR in a large, multicenter cohort.MethodsThree hundred and thirty patients (75.2% male, median age 63 years) with 502 coronary artery stenoses were included in this substudy of the MACHINE (Machine Learning Based CT Angiography Derived FFR: A Multi-Center Registry) registry. Correlation of ML-CT-FFR with the invasive reference standard FFR was assessed and pooled diagnostic performance of ML-CT-FFR and cCTA was determined separately for the following stenosis locations: RCA, LAD, LCX, proximal, middle, and distal vessel segments.ResultsML-CT-FFR correlated well with invasive FFR across the different stenosis locations. Per-lesion analysis revealed improved diagnostic accuracy of ML-CT-FFR compared with conventional cCTA for stenoses in the RCA (71.8% [95% confidence interval, 63.0%–79.5%] vs. 54.8% [45.7%–63.8%]), LAD (79.3 [73.9–84.0] vs. 59.6 [53.5–65.6]), LCX (84.1 [76.0–90.3] vs. 63.7 [54.1–72.6]), proximal (81.5 [74.6–87.1] vs. 63.8 [55.9–71.2]), middle (81.2 [75.7–85.9] vs. 59.4 [53.0–65.6]) and distal stenosis location (67.4 [57.0–76.6] vs. 51.6 [41.1–62.0]).ConclusionIn a multicenter cohort with high disease prevalence, ML-CT-FFR offered improved diagnostic performance over cCTA for detecting hemodynamically relevant stenoses regardless of their location.     

非瓣膜性心房颤动合并重度三尖瓣反流的危险因素分析

目的:探讨非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)合并重度三尖瓣反流(TR)患者的临床特征及危险因素。方法:连续入选2016年1月至2019年12月就诊于我院的290例合并TR的NVAF患者,87例NVAF合并重度TR患者为重度TR组,男性35例,平均年龄(73.5±9.0)岁;203例NVAF合并轻-中度TR患者作为对照组,男性114例,平均年龄(66.2±10.9)岁。比较两组的临床特征,采用Logistics回归分析评估重度TR的危险因素。结果:290例NVAF患者中,30.0%合并重度TR,41.0%合并中度TR,29.0%合并轻度TR。与对照组相比,重度TR组年龄大[(73.5±9.0)岁vs(.66.2±10.9)岁]、心房颤动病程长[4.5(2.0,10.0)年vs.3.0(2.0,7.0)年]、心功能差、持续性心房颤动(96.6%vs.73.4%)及女性(59.8%vs.43.8%)比例高,同时心房扩大、肺动脉压升高及二尖瓣反流更明显(P均<0.05)。Logistics多因素回归分析显示,重度TR与年龄(OR=1.060,95%CI:1.020~1.102)、女性(OR=4.727,95%CI:1.977~11.306)、持续性心房颤动(OR=6.873,95%CI:1.419~33.297)、右心房左右径(OR=1.202,95%CI:1.117~1.293)相关(P均<0.05)。右心房左右径≥45.5 mm可预测重度TR,诊断敏感度为0.712,特异度为0.697;ROC曲线下面积为0.763(95%CI:0.696~0.831,P<0.001)。结论:NVAF合并重度TR的危险因素包括老年、女性、持续性心房颤动、右心房左右径扩大。     

Renal denervation prevents subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertensive heart disease: Randomized,sham-controlled trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (130KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion,A Misnomer?: Where Do We Go From Here?

The importance of the left atrial appendage (LAA) as the source of thromboembolism including stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is well documented, with more than 90% of ischemic strokes related to a LAA thrombus. Although oral anticoagulation has been the standard of care, approximately 50% to 60% of patients either have contraindications to oral anticoagulation or do not continue the medication beyond the first year. This led to the development of local site-specific therapy to occlude the LAA by either surgical or transcatheter means. Despite marked advancements, incomplete LAA closure with surgical and transcatheter approaches remains frequent. The etiology of incomplete LAA closure and its clinical implications remain unclear. Multiple strategies are in development including changes in deployment techniques, a new device design, and alternative approaches to leak closure.